‘Nanse’: the editor in chief of Atlantic exploits the administration of Trump ‘Smokescreens’ in the chat of the signal

The Atlantic Chief Editor, Jeffrey Goldberg, responded to the rejection of the Trump administration on Monday’s article of the publication about a signal chat discussing an American attack against Hutíes in Yemen, according to which he accidentally shared with Goldberg.

Speaking to ABC News, Goldberg said that the White House is getting involved in a semantic game by focusing on its use of “attack plans” instead of “war plans” in its follow -up report, which was published on Wednesday.

“Everything does not make sense. It makes no sense. They are throwing all these smoke quausers to avoid being interrogated about why they were so reckless that they had sensitive conversations as this sign, and why they invited a journalist and did not even know that the journalist was there,” he said Wednesday. “I mean, war plan, attack plan. I mean, you know, it is simply not a meaningless talk, but the attack is actually a precise term for what they were doing.”

This is a development story. Consult the updates again.